Interviews

Interviews

Michael Lehmann Administers Cup of Liquid Drainer to Heathers Sequel

MichaelLe_SGran_12456280_400.jpgWhen Star Trek came out earlier this year, Winona Ryder’s elevated press profile brought with it a fresh new wave of chatter about a potential sequel to Heathers. “Whatever you hear, there is a sequel in the works. I swear to God,” Ryder told Empire. “But for some reason the writer Dan Waters and director Michael Lehmann don’t want to talk about it.”

However, when we interviewed Lehmann about the Sundance Labs, he was entirely willing to talk about it, even though his prognosis was one Ryder might not be happy to hear. Read on for Lehmann’s thoughts on the matter:

Recently, there’s been a huge resurgence of Heathers sequel buzz. Is that rooted in anything real?
No. Winona’s been talking about this for years — she brings it up every once in a while and Dan Waters and I will joke about it, but as far as I know there’s no script and no plans to do the sequel. A couple weeks ago everyone started talking about it and I guess Winona said the movie was gonna get made, and I thought, “I don’t know, maybe they did this without me?” But I got in touch with Dan Waters and he said he didn’t know anything about it. So I don’t think there’s any truth to it.

Is it gratifying at least that so many people appear to want a sequel?
It’s funny to me. I love Heathers and I loved doing that movie. I’m very proud of it, so if it gets brought up, I’m happy. Generally, though, I don’t like sequels at all. If the movie’s good the first time, why bother? With something like The Matrix, for example, it feels like a trilogy, or with a comic-book movie, those movies were based on something that was created in a serial format. So a movie as specific as Heathers, which took place in a specific time and specific place and in which many of the characters got killed off, I never thought it made sense to see a sequel.

Maybe we’ve had some spiritual sequels instead, like Clueless and Mean Girls.
Sure, absolutely. It spawned a bunch of copycats. I’m all in favor of people — myself included — going into the same territory if there’s something that can be done with it. But if somebody says, “Make a sequel to Heathers,” I feel like, no, someone should make a good movie that’s a dark, satirical comedy that has that sensibility. ♦

Related entries

Email this

Comments

Veronica, why are pulling my dick?

... you pulling...

I think I prematurely ejaculated all over that quote.

Hey, wait now, did he just use The Matrix as the perfect example of a movie that needed to be a trilogy?

Maybe they should make a film about sad old Veronica spreading rumours about made-up films she's going to star in. Oh the humanity.

...Or maybe his genius is in DENYING the rumors to create more studio interest in MAKING a sequel?

(They're remaking Meatballs, kids, it's not like they're looking for new original ideas anywhere. If it worked once...)

And Winona swore to God. That bitch is going to hell.

This is just another example of the dweeb losers trying to emulate the cool kids. Is that pâté?

Heathers was all the way back in 1989. It was just a little cult flick that took in a bit over a million bucks. It wasn't a major hit that was even needing a sequel at all,if ever. Leave it in the past and move the fhuck on. No one of todays generation (or the old generation) gives a shyt.

Post a comment

By the Numbers: weekend takes every Monday
Shutter Island Paramount
$22.67M
$75.54M
Cop Out Warner
$18.21M
$18.21M
Crazies Overture
$16.07M
$16.07M
Avatar Fox
$13.66M
$706.56M
Percy Jackson Fox
$9.58M
$71.00M
Valentine's Day Warner
$9.06M
$99.92M
Dear John Sony
$4.81M
$72.43M
Wolfman Universal
$4.26M
$57.38M
Tooth Fairy Fox
$3.43M
$53.84M
Crazy Heart Searchlight
$2.46M
$25.01M
Data courtesy of Rentrak